TREPA on Facebook

TREPA has a Group presence on Facebook for those who are connected with this mode of social interaction. If you would like to be a member of the Facebook connection and comment, then please join. Just type TREPA in the Search box the next time you are visiting Facebook, join up, leave a comment, and stay in touch. Would love to have you involved and connected.

Posted in General Information | Comments Off on TREPA on Facebook

Islands Group resets public meeting agenda/procedure!

This is a report by Carol Mahtab on the Public Meeting concerning aquaculture held at the Sandy Cove Fire Hall, Digby Neck, on August 26, 2010. There is a lesson to be learned here. The people attending the meeting were able to change the agenda and conduct of the meeting to have it address issues of importance to them, not the prearranged plan. It is very interesting reading. Carol’s Report follows:

Hi everyone:

There was a Public Meeting in the Sandy Cove Fire Hall yesterday!!!!

The room had been set up with several tables with chairs around the floor, lots of handouts on the tables with a government official presiding at each table. (How often have we faced this a public “informational” meetings?)

There was a general gathering of the public in the parking lot outside until the Islands group arrived from the 5 pm ferry.   We all entered at the same time and lined up along one of the sides of the room.   Some chairs from the tables were quietly moved to accommodate some seniors and then more chairs were taken down from the stage area until the first line of the public was seated in front.   I believe that the officials realized at this point that the afternoon’s agenda had been changed. This took about 10 minutes to complete, all very quiet and orderly.

The government officials looked on without protest except for the facilitator, Ken Donnelly, who agreed then to have this Q&A session for 30 minutes, then returning to the Government’s original plan.   We left the meeting shortly after 8 pm and there had been no change in the programme of the afternoon!   Everyone was still lined up or seated on one side of the room and the Government officials at various places on the other side.   Some officials remained seated at their tables during the 3 hours.   It was a question and answer meeting for the public until we left.

All was very orderly and Mr. Donnelly had to raise his voice only once or twice when he thought things would go off the rails.   They didn’t.   There were no rants, instead very intelligent and relevant questions which were answered clearly and with care by, mostly, Marshal Giles from NS and, particularly I (Carol) thought, Kevin LeBlanc from Transport Canada.   Mr. LeBlanc took a great deal of time to explain the mysterious process of the CEAA and their Environmental Assessment.   He also appears to have been overwhelmed by the responses he has received so far and said he is reviewing them very carefully and seriously.

Ashraf’s estimate from the public was about 125 and we heard NOT A SINGLE SOUL that was for the fish farm.   Fishermen, tourism people well represented.

One interesting comment for me was from a Cook’s (aquaculture) representative just as we were leaving.   (Towards the end of the time, several people wanted to ask questions of Cook’s.)   She was explaining just how effectively Cook’s works with the local communities and specifically reported that Cook’s has an excellent relationship with the Friends of Port Mouton Bay!   Did I miss something here????

Just thought that you will enjoy knowing that the Islands community succeeded in turning the meeting around and that it was most successful.   Perhaps the severely controlled Governmental meetings will become a thing of the past.   I certainly hope that the people of the Islands realize exactly what they have done to the concept of “transparency” and all that!

Posted in Coastal Issues, Public Participation | 1 Comment

Protecting Bay of Fundy

This is an article from the Halifax, NS, Chronical-Herald written by Chris Miller and Rodrigo Menafra who are with the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society in Halifax.  They point out the need for better attention to coastal planning in Nova Scotia.

The Bay of Fundy, with its high tides and abundance of wildlife, is a global treasure. There’s no doubt about that. We support the efforts by the Nova Scotia government to advocate for the Bay of Fundy to be included as one of the new seven natural wonders of the world in the global competition currently underway.

But, in asking the world to declare the Bay of Fundy one of the seven natural wonders, our government needs to make sure that it is treating the bay that way, and takes the necessary steps to properly protect its important ecology and ecosystems from degradation. Unquestionably, there’s more that the governments of Nova Scotia and Canada could be doing.

The Bay of Fundy lacks a system of marine protected areas to protect its important and unique natural features, particularly areas where globally significant concentrations of whales occur. This, despite existing commitments from the federal government to establish representative marine protected areas in all regions of the country. There are some small sites protected as whale sanctuaries, but these designations have relatively weak legal teeth.

The province also lacks a comprehensive coastal policy to adequately protect our shorelines, including those along the Bay of Fundy. Some progress has been made in recent years towards developing this policy, but without changes in our coastal land-use policies and help for the municipalities, we’ll continue to see beaches and wetlands being destroyed, and houses built along the shore where they shouldn’t be.

Incompatible industrial development proposals for the Bay of Fundy also pop up from time to time, and some have come within a hair’s breadth of being approved. A few years ago, a proposal surfaced to establish a huge mega-quarry and marine terminal on the shores of Digby Neck to provide aggregate to the northeastern United States. Fortunately, that proposal never received the required environmental approvals, but since then, the Nova Scotia government has failed to develop policies to prioritize our coastline into areas where development makes sense, and areas where it doesn’t. Without better policies in place, coastal mega-quarry proposals for the Bay of Fundy will continue to pop up near important whale areas, and aquaculture sites near important fishing grounds.

The province also does not yet have a final “no net loss” policy for wetlands to prohibit any development from occurring on the tidal salt marshes of the Bay of Fundy. Only a fraction of these important salt marshes remain to support the large populations of migratory birds travelling up and down the Atlantic flyway. A clear policy is needed from the government that will ensure the tidal salt marshes along the bay will be protected and restored.

Not all is doom and gloom. Some important steps have been made recently to protect the ecology of the Bay of Fundy and there’s definitely some world-class research and conservation efforts taking place there. The movement of the shipping lanes in the bay seems to be helping to protect the endangered right whales from ship collisions; Parks Canada is conducting a comprehensive study of the Bay of Fundy to identify important marine areas for conservation; and the Nova Scotia government recently acquired long stretches of coastline along the bay for conservation, between Apple Head and Joggins.

These are encouraging steps, but our government needs to do more, and soon. To start, let’s get a system of marine protected areas in place, a coastal land-use plan that protects the shoreline of the Bay of Fundy, and a wetland policy that safeguards its tidal salt marshes. If the Bay of Fundy truly is the global treasure we’re saying it is, let’s treat it that way and show the world that we stand behind our call to have it declared one of the new seven natural wonders of the world.

Posted in Coastal Issues | Comments Off on Protecting Bay of Fundy

Worrisome Water Series

TREPA was in the news today. Specifically, our subcommittee on water quality issues in the Carlton River watershed was mentioned in a front page article in the Vanguard of August 24, 2010. Randy and Jean Cleveland (Board Member) and the committee, have been instrumental in keeping this issue before the public. There are two comprehensive articles by Michael Gorman. One is on the issues of cyanobacteria related to blue-green algae whose growth is usually related to increased nutrients in the water. The other is on the willingness of the mink industry to cooperate on finding the sources of pollution and a solution.

The head of the Nova Scotia Mink Breeders Association is quoted as saying there is no proof that the industry is the source of the problems with the water. Maybe not. There are 104 mink licences in Digby County, many of which are on the affected water systems. Other potential sources have been identified as septic systems, graveyards, and global warming. Take your pick. Interesting that other lakes, without mink farms in their headwaters, do not seem to have an issue with blue-green algae.

Thanks to the Vanguard for initiating this this continuing series. Please keep posted.

Posted in Water Pollution | Comments Off on Worrisome Water Series

A fresh look at forestry practices

Forest and Forestry at Windhorse, Fall 2010

In October  and November, there will be a series of three programs exploring the 170 year history, philosophy, and methods of forest protection and commercial forestry at Windhorse Farm. The series may be of interest to TREPA members who own woodlots, would like to pass notice of this opportunity on to others or would just like an experience in enlightened forest appreciation and practice.
The first in the series, October 17-21. Forest Retreat: exploring the magic of the Windhorse forest. During this forest retreat, led by Dan Hessey, Jim Drescher and Crane Stookey, you will be introduced to a variety of methods that the presenters have found beneficial in their own practices of relaxation and wakefulness in the natural landscape (and seascape). While there will be considerable emphasis on stillness and sensory awareness practice, we will also delve more deeply into the material presented by Mr. Hessey during the previous weekend. This will be done through reflection on, and discussion of, the principles of “drala” and “windhorse” as they are encountered in the forest. Beginning Sunday evening and going until after lunch on Thursday, we will spend almost all our time in the forest, although in the event of wet nights, we may sleep indoors. Simple meals will be provided.
Enrichment Forestry, the second program, November 5-7, will be an intensive look into the view of forestry, which has been practiced in this place since 1840. It will serve as an introduction to the Windhorse way of sustainable forestry. The basic principle is “Nothing Missing”, or the experience of no fundamental problem. On that ground, you will learn about the 170-year history of forestry in this place and work with the 16-point forest practice developed at Windhorse over the past 20 years. This weekend program is open to anyone with a genuine interest in forestry or in the work of Windhorse Farm. It is prerequisite for the 4-week horse logging internship, which begins on November 8, 2010, and the cost of the program is included in the fee for the internship.
The concluding section is the 4-week horse Logging Internship, with master horse logger and ferrier, Peter Churchill, Nov 8 – Dec 4. This is for those seriously interested in learning the methods used in the Windhorse way of forestry. No previous experience is necessary. Peter will teach the care of horses, harnessing, hitching, driving, and logging. Jim will provide ecological context and instruction in long-term selection harvest planning. This is an intensive program, with five days/week of teaching, leaving weekends for practice.
A 10% discount is available to anyone registering for all 3 courses.
To enquire about, or register for, any of these programs, contact Steve Murray <steve@windhorsefarm.org>”  or Jim Drescher <jim@windhorsefarm.org”>
Posted in Events | 4 Comments