ECA staff looks at forest biomass issue

By JAMIE SIMPSON and RAYMOND PLOURDE
Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Paul MacDonald, NewPage’s superintendent for Pictou County and St. Mary’s, talks about a proposed biomass project from a forest stand in Pictou County last July. (Christian Laforce / Staff)With the recent announcement of federal government funding of forest biomass projects for Northern Pulp Corporation and Nova Scotia Power Inc., we propose the following question: “How could the Nova Scotia government design the worst possible biomass energy strategy for our province?”

Here are six criteria such a strategy should meet, and a look at how well the government has done in implementing such a strategy.

1. Go forward with no solid evidence of how much biomass supply is feasibly available.
Result? Done! The provincial government created a regulatory framework to promote one million tonnes of new forest biomass harvesting without an honest idea of the feasible, available supply of forest biomass, or the effect of this harvest on our forests and the wildlife populations that depend on them. The Department of Natural Resources has suggested the supply exists and is feasibly available, but has not provided evidence to support its numbers.

2. Burn the forest in the least efficient way possible to generate energy, so that we add to the carbon problem for the foreseeable future instead of reducing it, and burn a lot more trees in the process.

Result? Done! The government failed to specify a minimum efficiency for biomass energy projects, thereby allowing extremely carbon-polluting methods of burning biomass to flourish, while burning far more trees than necessary. All of the proposed major forest biomass projects will actually increase carbon emissions for the foreseeable future.

Increased demand for biomass wood will also drive up the price of firewood for people who heat their homes with wood. Ironically, heating homes (and other buildings) with wood is actually one of the best forms of “biomass” energy, and the province’s direction will only make it more expensive for those who rely on firewood for heat.

3. Make sure biomass energy projects are in the hands of foreign-owned forestry corporations and Nova Scotia Power Inc., so that as little of the profits remain in Nova Scotia as possible.
Result? Done! Major forest biomass projects for Nova Scotia are in the hands of NewPage Corp. (Miamisburg, Ohio), Northern Pulp Corp. (Wall Street, New York City), and Nova Scotia Power Inc.

4. Concentrate all of the demand for forest biomass in one geographic region of the province (the region hardest hit by wood shortages and degraded forests).
Result? Done! The major proposed biomass projects are in Trenton (central Nova Scotia), Pictou (central N.S.) and Port Hawkesbury (eastern N.S.). The central region of Nova Scotia has the most severe wood shortage problem in the province, followed by the eastern region.

5. Favour biomass harvesting over quality-improvement forestry, value-added manufacturing, and affordable firewood for home heating.
Result? Done! Forest biomass is the least valuable “wood product” ever produced in Nova Scotia. Creating a massive new demand for biomass wood, concentrated in the central and eastern regions of Nova Scotia, means much of the forest resource will be reduced to biomass or “hog” fuel to feed biomass boilers for decades to come. Meanwhile, rising costs and shrinking supplies of firewood for home heating is inevitable as this new consumptive wave kicks in.

6. Subsidize forestry companies and Nova Scotia Power Inc. with taxpayer dollars to enable them to burn Nova Scotia’s forests.
Result? Done! To be fair, the province had some help from the federal government with the recent subsidies of $28.1 million of taxpayers’ money for the Wall Street, New York City-based Northern Pulp Corp. and $8.2 million for Nova Scotia Power Inc. As well, the province recently gave Northern Pulp Corp. a $75-million loan to help keep it afloat. Visit www.flickr.com/photos/jamiesimpson and click on “Northern Pulp” for photos of what Northern Pulp does to the forests.

What would be a sensible approach to biomass energy in Nova Scotia? First, introduce a minimum efficiency for biomass projects, at least any that receive taxpayer money or which qualify for special status under the Renewable Energy Regulations. At present in Nova Scotia, all of the proposed major biomass projects will only exacerbate climate change for decades because they use inherently inefficient technologies that burn a lot of trees for little usable energy.

Second, give preference to community-based or locally owned biomass energy projects, which would avoid concentrating the pressure on our forests, and would keep money circulating within Nova Scotia.

With a little vision, the NDP government could have created a biomass energy scenario for our province that made sense. Now, it appears that the government has entrenched a biomass energy strategy that will suck money out of our province, inflict hardship on those who heat their homes with wood, and further degrade our forests in the process. The record is clear: Premier Darrell Dexter and the NDP have failed Nova Scotia on this account.

Jamie Simpson is the forestry program co-ordinator and Raymond Plourde the wilderness co-ordinator with the Ecology Action Centre.

Posted in For the Record, Forestry Issues | Comments Off on ECA staff looks at forest biomass issue

TREPA on fur farm management

TREPA supports the regulation of the fur farm industry as it relates to the issue of management of waste and runoff into our water systems. The following considerations have been shared with our Ministers of Agriculture and Environment, both of whom have a responsibility in this area.

Process:

  1. Public involvement is needed from all concerned stakeholders in developing these regulations. We would like to see a first draft of the regulations, once they are ready, either e-mailed out or put on  the Department of Agriculture website, and a reasonable period of time given for stakeholders to comment.  We suggest giving stakeholders one month to review the draft and comment, prior to redrafting.
  2. These regulations should be done right, before they are circulated.  If this cannot be done before the June deadline, then the deadline should be pushed further ahead.
  3. The bigger the technical drafting committee, the more unwieldly.  That said, a limnologist from Department of Environment should be an explicit participant.  Darrel Taylor may fill the bill, since he knows the area.

Content:

  1. The new regulations should use what has already been developed  in the Environmental Regulations Handbook for Nova Scotia Agriculture, and  Manure Management Guidelines, as well as regulations.
  2. It is encouraging to hear that Farm Management Plans, developed in consultation with accredited expertise, will now become mandatory, and that they will be more comprehensive than the current voluntary Environmental Farm Plans and Nutrient Management Plans.  Care should be taken to assure that no loopholes slip in, in the process of incorporating details of the voluntary plans into the mandatory management plans.
  3. Any significant changes to the farm (for example, significant expansion, significant increase in number of animals) would need a new approval.  “Significant” requires clear definition , and needs to take  into account incremental “non-significant” changes.
  4. It’s good that inspectors will have the authority to make unannounced visits, but who enforces and the minimum frequency of visits needs to be specified.
  5. Inspection results should be publicly available.  Data should be available on the basis of watershed area, since this, not municipality, is the environmentally relevant unit .
  6. Enforcement budget is a concern.  So far, violators can get away with it, even when reported.  Money is tight, but this needs to be addressed. Penalties need definition and should be sufficient to discourage violations strongly.
  7. Environmental and water quality protection, disease control, and nutrient management all need to be covered by the regulations.

External to the regulations, but of major importance:

  1. The fact that an approval may be granted irrespective of past history or neighbouring land use is a major concern, and somehow needs to be addressed by the province. Cumulative effects of past land use, and management on the basis of watershed area need to guide the regulatory process.  Otherwise, problems with pollution will continue to affect the environment, citizens and governments.
  2. The by-laws of various municipalities and provincial regulations need better coordination. Better communications among the Departments of Agriculture, Environment, Natural Resources, and municipalities would be helpful.  Because of the division of authority among departments, there is nobody to take control of the situation.
Posted in For the Record, Fur Farm Management, Public Participation | Comments Off on TREPA on fur farm management

Jen Graham on our coastal issues

A vulnerable scenic coastal area in Nova Scotia

In the audio clip below, Jen Graham, Ecology Action Centre, talks about the need for a meaningful Nova Scotia Coastal Policy on CBC’s Mainstreet, January 18th, 2011.

Click on the link to hear the program.

CBCRADIOONE_MAINSTREET_3_08PM_JAN18_2011_HALIFAX_10_35MIN

Posted in Coastal Issues | Comments Off on Jen Graham on our coastal issues

NS water resource management strategy released

Water for Life: Nova Scotia’s Water Resource Management Strategy has been released by Minister Sterling Belliveau.  Stakeholders, First Nations, community organizations, and individuals participated in and supported the development of the Water Strategy.


The report, in English and French, can be viewed and printed under More Information at: http://www.gov.ns.ca/nse/water.strategy/

Nova Scotia’s Water Strategy Launch news release can be found at:
http://gov.ns.ca/news/smr/2010-12-16-Water-Strategy/

Posted in Water Management | Comments Off on NS water resource management strategy released

Future of wind power?

There is an interesting video at http://nyti.ms/g1UiDn showing a new approach to collection of wind energy for power. It uses a vibrations to capture piezoelectricity. The beauty is that it works in low wind situations, has no noise factor, can be adapted to urban situations for installation on buildings, and is very inexpensive. If you Google Vibro-Wind you will get a page of additional articles.

Posted in Energy | Comments Off on Future of wind power?